Saturday, November 29, 2025

Software program growth has a ‘996’ drawback

Code is a legal responsibility, not an asset

Let’s get again to first ideas. As any senior engineer is aware of, software program growth just isn’t a typing contest. It’s a decision-making course of. The job is much less about writing code and extra about determining what code not to write down. As Honeycomb founder and CTO Charity Majors places it, being a senior software program engineer “has way more to do along with your means to grasp, keep, clarify, and handle a big physique of software program in manufacturing over time, in addition to the power to translate enterprise wants into technical implementation.”

Each line of code you ship is a legal responsibility. Each line have to be secured, debugged, maintained, and finally refactored. Once we use AI to brute-force the “development” part of software program, we maximize this legal responsibility. We create huge floor areas of complexity which may remedy the instant Jira ticket however mortgages the long run stability of the platform.

Orosz’s level about 996 corporations producing copies is telling. Innovation requires the “slack” to suppose with out the fixed interruptions of conferences. Given a quiet second, you would possibly notice that the function you have been about to construct is definitely pointless. In case your builders are spending their days reviewing an avalanche of AI-generated pull requests, they haven’t any slack. They don’t seem to be architects; they’re janitors cleansing up after a robotic that by no means sleeps.

Related Articles

Latest Articles