Simply printed (open entry) in Nature Human Behaviour:
Bayesian Evaluation Reporting Tips
Summary: Earlier surveys of the literature have proven that experiences of
statistical analyses typically lack essential data, inflicting lack of
transparency and failure of reproducibility. Editors and authors agree
that tips for reporting must be inspired. This Evaluate presents
a set of Bayesian evaluation reporting tips (BARG). The BARG
embody the options of earlier tips, whereas together with many
further particulars for up to date Bayesian analyses, with
explanations. An intensive instance of making use of the BARG is introduced.
The BARG must be helpful to researchers, authors, reviewers, editors,
educators and college students. Utilization, endorsement and promotion of the
BARG could enhance the standard, transparency and reproducibility of
Bayesian analyses.
The open entry article is out there at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01177-7
The Supplementary Data is out there at https://osf.io/w7cph/
Quotation: Kruschke, J.Okay. Bayesian Evaluation Reporting Tips.
Nat Hum Behav (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7
(Within the unique model of the manuscript, I made a couple of puns involving BARG and BORG. The ultimate printed model retained just one allusion to the BORG: “The BARG have assimilated many earlier checklists…”)
Replace: See additionally the weblog submit at Nature.