The Trump administration was legally required to launch all paperwork associated to federal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein by Friday, with solely restricted grounds for withholding paperwork and full explanations required for any redactions.
It didn’t do that. Or something near it.
The Justice Division launched a number of thousand paperwork Friday, however high officers acknowledged that that they had a whole bunch of hundreds extra that weren’t launched but, purportedly as a result of they weren’t reviewed or prepared. Many of the paperwork they did launch had been pictures — both pictures the FBI took of Epstein’s properties, or pictures Epstein himself possessed. Of the investigative paperwork launched, many had been totally redacted, coated in black packing containers.
A few of the main Republicans who’d pushed the administration for disclosure expressed disappointment of their compliance, with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) saying the discharge “grossly fails to adjust to each the spirit and the letter of the regulation.”
Unsurprisingly, these restricted releases do nothing to clear up the swirling questions folks had in regards to the Epstein scandal.
And whereas a few of these swirling questions quantity to conspiracy theories that may by no means be definitively cleared up by any doc launch, there may be one huge query that may be answered to some extent by paperwork within the authorities’s possession.
Particularly, did investigators imagine there have been different males concerned in Epstein’s intercourse crimes, and in that case, why didn’t they cost any of them?
The Justice Division has paperwork that will reply this query
Officers on the Justice Division have been very clear that they imagine Epstein sexually abused no less than a whole bunch of ladies or underage women within the Nineteen Nineties and 2000s.
However officers have been a lot much less clear on a associated query: whether or not Epstein trafficked sure of those ladies or women to any of his distinguished and influential buddies.
Sure Epstein accusers — most notably, the late Virginia Roberts Giuffre — claimed that that is certainly what occurred to them. Giuffre mentioned publicly that Epstein groomed her to have intercourse with him and his influential buddies in trade for cash, which she did for a couple of years. And Giuffre particularly named a few of the males who she mentioned participated, together with the UK’s now-former Prince Andrew.
The FBI has been conscious of Giuffre’s allegations since 2011. One of many paperwork within the new launch describes a few of officers’ conversations with Giuffre that 12 months, by which she “indicated Epstein had instructed her to have intercourse with quite a few associates in each the USA and abroad.”
It’s primarily Giuffre’s claims that satisfied many individuals that Epstein was not solely abusing victims himself, however that he was additionally offering younger ladies and underage women to different males.
But no different males had been ever charged with Epstein-related crimes. And the massive query is: why not?
There are a lot of doable explanations, starting from the prosaic (evidentiary issues, statutes of limitation) to the nefarious (cover-up) to someplace in between (questions on witness credibility). However certainly, in some unspecified time in the future, somebody concerned within the investigation wrote one thing down about this, assessing whether or not Giuffre’s claims appeared credible, whether or not different ladies made related claims, and whether or not such claims merited additional investigation — or not.
Extra broadly, investigators needed to in some unspecified time in the future grapple with whether or not they themselves thought the proof steered Epstein was supplying women or younger ladies to his buddies.
Sometimes, such inside assessments would by no means see the sunshine of day in the event that they didn’t lead to prices. However they need to be someplace within the Justice Division’s Epstein information. So will we ever see them, or not?
